With these analyses, we're getting closer to clo email lists australia sing that gap. We don't want to suggest that this data is perfect (the error bars and accuracy analyses show that's obviously not the case), but it's certainly a great extra piece to add to the equation. Things the data suggests that we feel good about: Links are important, but naive link data can mislead. . No single metric can predict rankings (at least, not yet) H1s (and H2s-H4s) probably aren't very important places to use your keywords Alt attributes of images are probably pretty important places to use your keywords Keyword stuffing may be holding you back (particularly if you're outside the top 15 results and overusing it) Likewise, overdoing it with (not-so-great) links might be hurting you We're definitely looking forward to comments and questions, but Ben & I are in the UK and may not be back online for a while (Ben's plane leaves in a few hours for the US and British Airways doesn't yet have wifi in-flight).
p.s. A shoutout to Tim Grice from SEOWizz, who put together this correlation analysis a few weeks back. In May 2007 Google announced the universal results in Google Search with the philosophy of integrating all departments Images, Blogs, News, Products, Maps, Books and videos directly to the traditional results page. Google Universal Results About a year later, Google has enabled this feature to Google results in Brazil. Thus, we could see an usability and integration increase of Google products, providing an increasingly rich content to users' searches.