Analyzing the above norms

[roseline371274]

The court concludes that the main purpose of the court's application of such a measure of restriction of ownership rights as the transfer of assets to the management of the National Agency was to ensure their preservation and preservation of their economic value.

At the same time, the investigating judge was not provided by the prosecution with data on the direction of actions to conduct an assessment and obtain a report on the assessment of assets , in particular the specified property, which directly contradicts Article 19 of the Law of Ukraine "On the National Agency of Ukraine for the Identification, Search and Management of Assets Obtained from Corruption and Other Crimes" and Article 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine (October 13, 2023, investigating judge of the Pechersk District special database Court in case No. 757/39004/23-k (EDRSRU No. 114253164).

CONCLUSION: Given the lack of an assessment of the seized property, the investigating judge cancels the transfer of assets to the management of the National Agency of Ukraine for the Identification, Tracing and Management of Assets Obtained from Corruption and Other Crimes.